|
Written by Vince Baughan
|
|
Wednesday, 28 November 2007 |
|
Disaster!
Bath's Development Control Committee have granted planning permission for the Holburne's extension, 7 votes to 4 (one abstention). For excellent, and detailed notes on the committee meeting, please refer to the Bath Heritage Watchdog's Holburne WEB page. It describes the irregularities very well. 
R.I.P. Heritage
What has change, since the July committee meeting? Certainly not the design. It is the same as the one resoundingly refused, except a change of colour. All that has happened is that Parry has changed the colour from blue to beige, and the committee had a closed meeting at which developers were allowed to present "facts", unchallanged (and to add to the pressure, Geoff Webber was acting as cheerleader for the project - as he has done since this whole calamity began). The committee was showing signs of being able to protect The City from damaging developments. However, one tweaked design, a closed meeting with the developer, and POW! Heritage, The Holburne and Sydney Gardens is hit. |
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 12 December 2007 )
|
|
|
Another Opportunity to Stop the Holburne |
|
Written by Vince Baughan
|
|
Sunday, 26 October 2008 |
|
Parry’s disastrous Hoburne development has hit a show-stopping “hitch”. It seems that, for all the years of careful planning and fastidious study, the Holburne’s development team didn’t quite do their homework properly. An assumption was made about something as fundamental as the installation of air conditioning plant. Now they are faced with the embarrassing and expensive process of re-submitting the whole planning application! The question that begs an answer is : What other assumptions have been made which could jeopardise the development? At least this oversight was discovered, before the demolition and building work had begun. It gives us the opportunity voice our concerns again. Holburne's Planning Application The independently run Holburne already needed a £200,000 of council money (that’s our money) to kick-start the release of private donations capital. Why would private money, already promised to the scheme need public money to release it? And what’s more, the scheme is still £1.5m short for its running costs capital. Please write to the Planning Committee before 28th October, objecting to this development. |
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 26 October 2008 )
|
|
|
